Religious Studies 39 (4):451-458 (2003)

Authors
Nick Trakakis
Australian Catholic University
Abstract
Kirk Durston recently presented an argument aimed against evidential arguments from evil predicated on instances of suffering that appear to be gratuitous; ‘The consequential complexity of history and gratuitous evil’, Religious Studies, 36 (2000), 65–80. He begins with the notion that history consists of an intricate web of causal chains, so that a single event in one such chain may have countless unforeseen consequences. According to Durston, this consequential complexity exhibited by history negatively impacts on our grasp of the data necessary to determine whether or not an evil is gratuitous. He therefore concludes that our epistemic condition poses an insurmountable barrier towards the inference from inscrutability to pointlessness. By way of reply, I contend that Durston's argument is flawed in two significant respects, and thus the evidential argument emerges unscathed from his critique.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0034412503006589
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Persistent Problem of Evil.Bruce Russell - 1989 - Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):121-139.
The Empirical Argument From Evil.William Rowe - 1986 - In William Wainwright & Robert Audi (eds.), Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment: New Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Cornell University Press. pp. 227--247.
Evil and God's Freedom in Creation.William Rowe - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):101 - 113.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Skeptical Theism.Justin P. McBrayer - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Capital Punishment as a Response to Evil.Peter Brian Barry - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (2):245-264.
The Evidential Problem of Evil.Nick Trakakis - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What No Eye has Seen: The Skeptical Theist Response to Rowe's Evidential Argument From Evil.Nick Trakakis - 2012 - Philo: The Journal of the Society of Humanist Philosophers 6 (2):250-266.
Evidential Problem of Evil, The.Nick Trakakis - forthcoming - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Philosophy of Evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Dalkey Archive Press.
Overcoming the Limits of Theodicy: An Interactive Reciprocal Response to Evil.John Culp - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (3):263-276.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
32 ( #299,218 of 2,324,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #688,650 of 2,324,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes