Journal of Moral Education 12 (3):192-207 (1983)
Abstract Previous conceptual analyses and empirical research concerning moral development and moral education have almost completely failed to take into account the distinction between objectivist and subjectivist positions on the nature of morality. This paper begins by outlining the essential elements in the two positions and pointing to the significance of the issue for the study of moral thought and for the discussion of moral maturity. Reference is briefly made to problems in current theories arising from the neglect of the distinction. Empirical evidence is then presented in order to document the importance of this factor in moral thought, with special reference to the dominance of the objectivist position and the correlates of objectivism. Evidence on developmental trends in objectivism is discussed, pointing to the need for extension of Piaget's theory. Implications for the ?regression? phenomenon are drawn and the significance of subjectivist views for the problem of moral education is considered. ? This paper collects together and presents in a more compact form some of the themes argued at length in Dimensions of Moral Thought, Sydney, University of New South Wales Press, 1982
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Critical Analysis of Kohlberg' S Contributions to the Study of Moral Thought.F. E. Trainer - 1977 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 7 (1):41–64.
The Place of Kohlberg's Theory in Moral Education∗.Richard Peters - 1978 - Journal of Moral Education 7 (3):147-157.
Form, Content and Justice in Moral Reasoning.Robert P. Craig - 1976 - Educational Theory 26 (2):154-157.
Citations of this work BETA
The Assessment of Moral Autonomy Within a Multidimensional Approach to the Development of Moral Reasoning.Peter E. Langford - 1991 - Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):55-78.
Do Senior Secondary Students Possess the Moral Maturity to Negotiate Class Rules?Peter E. Langford, Hildegard Lovegrove & Malcolm N. Lovegrove - 1994 - Journal of Moral Education 23 (4):387-407.
Similar books and articles
Do 'Objectivist' Features of Moral Discourse and Thinking Support Moral Objectivism?Gunnar Björnsson - 2012 - Journal of Ethics 16 (4):367-393.
Ethical Objectivity and Moral Education.Brenda Cohen - 1983 - Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):131-136.
Practical Ethics and Moral Objectivism.Margarita M. Valdés - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:73-81.
Kohlberg and Piaget: Differences and Similarities.Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos - 1991 - Journal of Moral Education 20 (1):47-54.
Education in Moral Theory and the Improvement of Moral Thought.Jonathan Friday * - 2004 - Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):23-33.
Moral Development; Some Suggested Implications for Teaching.Frank Simon - 1976 - Journal of Moral Education 5 (2):173-178.
The Relationship Between Moral Development and Self‐Actualization.Michael Daniels - 1984 - Journal of Moral Education 13 (1):25-30.
Science and Ethics: Demarcation, Holism and Logical Consequences.Nick Zangwill - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):126-138.
The Subjectivity of Moral Judgements: A Defence.Felix E. Oppenheim - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):42-61.
The Subjectivist Consequences of Expressivism.Jussi Suikkanen - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):364-387.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads28 ( #184,934 of 2,177,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,245 of 2,177,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?