Harmony and Paradox: Intensional Aspects of Proof-Theoretic Semantics

Springer Verlag (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This open access book investigates the role played by identity of proofs in proof-theoretic semantics. It develops a conception of proof-theoretic semantics as primarily concerned with the relationship between proofs (understood as abstract entities) and derivations (the linguistic representations of proofs). It demonstrates that identity of proof is a key both to clarify some —still not wholly understood— notions at the core of proof-theoretic semantics, such as harmony; and to broaden the range of the phenomena which can be analyzed using the tools of this semantic paradigm, so as to include for instance paradoxes. The volume covers topics such as the philosophical significance of different criteria of identity of proofs, and adequacy conditions for an intensional account of the notion of harmony. The author also examines the Prawitz-Tennant analysis of paradoxes by investigating on the one hand the prospects of turning it into a theory of meaning for paradoxical languages, and on the other hand two distinct kinds of phenomena, first observed by Crabbe and Ekman, showing that the Tennant-Prawitz criterion for paradoxicality overgenerates. This volume is of interest to scholars in formal and philosophical logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,599

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-19

Downloads
40 (#666,744)

6 months
8 (#682,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luca Tranchini
Universität Tübingen

Citations of this work

Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2024 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Which ‘Intensional Paradoxes’ are Paradoxes?Neil Tennant - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (4):933-957.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references