Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:221-234 (2003)
One way to work toward intercultural understanding is through interreligious dialogue, given the centrality that religion often has in a culture. David Burrell has suggested that Maimonides and Aquinas can offer us principles for interreligious dialogue. In particular, he argues that their negative theology shows us the impossibility of one tradition claiming a better understanding of God than those advanced by other traditions. This should lead religious traditions away fromcompetition and toward dialogue. In my paper, I propose a critique of Burrell’s thesis, arguing for a different interpretation of Maimonides and Aquinas and adifferent understanding of interreligious dialogue. While it is true that Maimonides and Aquinas have a well-developed sense of the limits of our theological knowledge, they do not draw the conclusion that these limitations necessarily make all understandings of God equal. I think Maimonides and Aquinas show us instead that the firmest basis for interreligious dialogue is the recognition that some genuine knowledge of the divine is available to all, regardless of religious tradition
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Conference Proceedings History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pluralism, Postmodernism and Interreligious Dialogue.Douglas Pratt - 2007 - Sophia 46 (3):245-261.
Critical Realism as a Philosophical Foundation for Interreligious Dialogue.John R. Friday - 2012 - Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):113-135.
Sanctity and Silence.Kenneth Seeskin - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):7-24.
Understanding Through Appropriation in Interreligious Dialogue on Ethics.Ariane Hentsch Cisneros - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):246-259.
Constructive Dialogical Pluralism: A Context of Interreligious Relations.Willy Pfändtner - 2010 - Sophia 49 (1):65-94.
Maimonides and Aquinas: A Medieval Misunderstanding?Jennifer Hart Weed - 2008 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (1):379 - 396.
Explorations in Global Ethics: Comparative Religious Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue.Sumner B. Twiss & Bruce Grelle (eds.) - 2000 - Westview Press.
Essays on Maimonides.Moses Maimonides & Salo Wittmayer Baron (eds.) - 1941 - New York: American Mathematical Society.
The Role of Reason in the Ethics of Maimonides: Or, Why Maimonides Could Have Had a Doctrine of Natural Law Even If He Did Not.Michael P. Levine - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):279 - 295.
A Philosophical Foray Into Difference and Dialogue.David B. Burrell - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):181-194.
In Response to the Religious Other : Levinas, Interreligious Dialogue and the Otherness of the Other.Marianne Moyaert - 2008 - In Roger Burggraeve (ed.), The Awakening to the Other: A Provocative Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. Peeters.
Knowing the Unknowable God: Ibn-Sina, Maimonides, Aquinas. By David B. Burrell.Francis J. Catania - 1988 - Modern Schoolman 65 (2):131-132.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads27 ( #185,551 of 2,154,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?