Logica Universalis 13 (4):457-466 (2019)

Authors
Marcin Trepczyński
University of Warsaw
Abstract
The article aims to show how the acceptance of non-monotonic logic enables arguments to be held between science and religion in a way that does not exclude either of these two spheres. The starting point of the analyses is the idea of the 13th century Danish philosopher, Boethius of Dacia, who states that it is both acceptable that: a natural scientist negates that the world had a beginning, and a Christian theologian asserts that the world had a beginning, because each of them is basing their statements on the principles of their respective discipline: the first on the principles of nature, and the latter on knowledge supplemented by divine revelation. What is more, analogically: a metaphysician, when limited to his principles, cannot settle the issue, as he takes into account supranatural beings and their powers, but cannot know what God or another powerful supranatural would have decided in a such a case. The paper shows that Boethius’s approach: violates the rule of monotonicity, cannot be finally interpreted in terms of classical logic and assumes certain non-monotonic logic as its inference framework. Other presented examples of arguments between religious beliefs and the statements of natural science are resolved in the same way. Thus, it is shown how non-monotonic thinking allows us to seriously treat both scientific and religious inference as compatible.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-019-00230-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thomas Aquinas Non-Monotonically.Marcin Trepczynski - 2011 - Filozofia Nauki 19 (2):115.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Pavel Florensky’s Theory of Religious Antinomies.Paweł Rojek - 2019 - Logica Universalis 13 (4):515-540.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Displaying the Modal Logic of Consistency.Heinrich Wansing - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1573-1590.
Rethinking Religious Language in the Age of Science.Koshy Tharakan - 2008 - Journal of Dharma 33 (1-4):405-411.
Applied Logic Without Psychologism.Gregory Wheeler - 2008 - Studia Logica 88 (1):137-156.
Displaying the Modal Logic of Consistency.Heinrich Wansing - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1573-1590.
Minimal Models Vs. Logic Programming: The Case of Counterfactual Conditionals.Katrin Schulz - 2014 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (1-2):153-168.
Modal Logic Based Theory for Non-Monotonic Reasoning.Pierre Siegel & Camilla Schwind - 1993 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3 (1):73-92.
Non-Monotonic Logic.G. Aldo Antonelli - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-14

Total views
10 ( #869,480 of 2,444,966 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #232,632 of 2,444,966 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes