In Thomas Hickmann, Lena Partzsch, Philipp H. Pattberg & Sabine Weiland (eds.), The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 219-237 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Human activity has reshaped all parts of the Earth system. For this reason, a vast majority of geologists at the 35th International Geological Congress in Cape Town (September 2016) spoke out in favor of changing the classification of geological epochs and of declaring a new world age – the Anthropocene. This chapter points at implications that the proclamation of the Anthropocene should have for the currently relevant concept of democracy. In particular, it is argued that the transition into a new phase of geology also necessitates a further advancement of our form of government. Democracy, as it has been conceived of and practiced until now, has to a large extent ignored the problem of ‘presentism’. This chapter suggests an extension of the 300-years-old separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branch. It is argued that in order to make our political system more future-oriented, there is a need for a new (fourth) branch which ensures that the interests of future generations be taken into account within today's decision-making process. A newly-established ‘future council’ should have the right to introduce legislation, integrating the competences of this new institution with those of parliament. The chapter concludes with a discussion about the legitimacy of offices for future generations (OFGs) as the embodiment of the proposed future branch.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy.Philip Pettit - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age.Hans Jonas - 1984 - Human Studies 11 (4):419-429.
View all 13 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Representing Future Generations: Political Presentism and Democratic Trusteeship.Dennis F. Thompson - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):17-37.
The Politics of the Anthropocene.John S. Dryzek & Jonathan Pickering - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rethinking Anthropos in the Anthropocene.Charles Brown - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (1):31-38.
Revamping the Image of Science for the Anthropocene.S. Andrew Inkpen & C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 11.
Earthing Technology : Toward an Eco-Centric Concept of Biomimetic Technologies in the Anthropocene.Vincent Blok - forthcoming - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology (2/3).
Deconstructing Anthropos: A Critical Legal Reflection on ‘Anthropocentric’ Law and Anthropocene ‘Humanity’.Anna Grear - 2015 - Law and Critique 26 (3):225-249.
Future Generations in Democracy: Representation or Consideration?Karsten Klint Jensen - 2015 - Jurisprudence 6 (3):535-548.
Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People.Kristian Skagen Ekeli - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5):429-450.
Education in the Anthropocene: Ethico-Moral Dimensions and Critical Realist Openings.Lausanne Laura Olvitt - 2017 - Journal of Moral Education 46 (4):396-409.
Friendship's Future: Derrida's Promising Thought.Blair McDonald - 2009 - Derrida Today 2 (2):210-221.
Political Representation of Future Generations.Danielle Zwarthoed - 2018 - In Marcus Düwell, Gerhard Bos & Naomi van Steenbergen (eds.), Towards the Ethics of a Green Future. The Theory and Practice of Human Rights for Future People. New York: Routledge. pp. 79-109.
The Sociocultural Self-Creation of a Natural Category: Social-Theoretical Reflections on Human Agency Under the Temporal Conditions of the Anthropocene.Piet Strydom - 2016 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):61-79.
Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Neimanis, Åsberg & Hedrén - 2015 - Ethics and the Environment 20 (1):67-97.
How to Prepare for the Unknown? On the Significance of Future Generations and Future Studies in Environmental Policy.Jan Boersema - 2001 - Environmental Values 10 (1):35-58.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-03-05
Total views
367 ( #27,125 of 2,497,780 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #12,491 of 2,497,780 )
2019-03-05
Total views
367 ( #27,125 of 2,497,780 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #12,491 of 2,497,780 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads