David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environment, Space, Place 2 (1):123-146 (2010)
Recently, a shadow has been cast over how geographical scale has been theorized. Neil Brenner has argued that scale risks becoming a empty concept because it has been conflated with other terms in geography such as place, region, and space; Marston, Jones, and Woodward have proposed doing away with scale altogether; while Wood has accused geographers of having a “scale fetish.” The following article defends the theory of scale against these various detractors and attempts to become a bulwark to support the many contributions that geographers have made to effectively characterizing the socio-spatial world. I outline four ways of understanding geographical scale: measurement, size, hierarchy, and relation. I then argue for an understanding of scale that is relational because I believe it provides the most adequate language to characterize how geographers have come to understand the social ontology of the spatialworld. Moreover, I set out to show how the relational description of scale, complements other research on scale, which has shown the importance of scale in the production of geographical difference and uneven social relations. Hence, the understanding of scales relationally, allows for people to have relative positions in the world. Finally, I speculate on two implications that the understanding of scale relatively has for characterizing the effects of globalization: 1) the possibilities that this understanding has for confronting a dominant tenant in the ideology of neoliberalism; 2) the promise that it offers for forms of political resistance
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bertell Ollman (1974). Alienation: Marx's Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):485-493.
Neil Smith (1986). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Science and Society 50 (2):250-253.
F. H. Bradley (1893). Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay,. Oxford University Press.
Frederick L. Will (1940). Internal Relations and the Principle of Identity. Philosophical Review 49 (5):497-514.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Skipper & Michael R. Hyman (1993). On Measuring Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (7):535 - 545.
Mark Whitehead (2003). From Moral Space to the Morality of Scale: The Case of the Sustainable Region. Ethics, Place and Environment 6 (3):235 – 257.
Gian Luca Casali (2011). Developing a Multidimensional Scale for Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):485-497.
Hendrik Van der Breggen (2002). Hume's Scale: How Hume Counts a Miracle's Improbability Twice. Philosophia Christi 4 (2):443 - 453.
Lea Pearson & Colin Elliott (1980). The Development of a Social Reasoning Scale in the New British Ability Scales. Journal of Moral Education 10 (1):40-48.
Ramsey Affifi (2013). Learning Plants: Semiosis Between the Parts and the Whole. [REVIEW] Biosemiotics 6 (3):547-559.
Dominic J. O'Meara (2006). Patterns of Perfection in Damascius' "Life of Isidore". Phronesis 51 (1):74 - 90.
Nirvana Tanoukhi (2011). The Scale of World Literature. In David Palumbo-Liu, Bruce Robbins & Nirvana Tanoukhi (eds.), Immanuel Wallerstein and the Problem of the World: System, Scale, Culture. Duke University Press.
Dima Sinapova (2008). A Model for a Very Good Scale and a Bad Scale. Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1361-1372.
Robert Klee (2008). Physical Scale Effects and Philosophical Thought Experiments. Metaphilosophy 39 (1):89–104.
Anusorn Singhapakdi, Scott J. Vitell, Kumar C. Rallapalli & Kenneth L. Kraft (1996). The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Scale Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1131 - 1140.
K. Sugiura, K. Muraoka, T. Chishiki & M. Baba (1983). The Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale: A New Scale for Assessing Impaired Consciousness. Neurosurgery 12:411-15.
Hugh LaFollette (2000). Gun Control. Ethics 110 (2):263-281.
Patrick Suppes (2006). Transitive Indistinguishability and Approximate Measurement with Standard Finite Ratio-Scale Representations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50:329-336.
Johanna Kujala & Tarja Pietiläinen (2004). Female Managers' Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):153-163.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads11 ( #381,261 of 1,924,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #417,761 of 1,924,718 )
How can I increase my downloads?