Ratio Juris 32 (1):49-75 (2019)

Authors
Jörg Tremmel
University Tübingen
Abstract
Constitutions enshrine the fundamental values of a people and they build a framework for a state’s public policy. With regard to generational change, their endurance gives rise to two interlinked concerns: the sovereignty concern and the forgone welfare concern. If constitutions are intergenerational contracts, how (in)flexible should they be? This article discusses perpetual constitutions, sunset constitutions, constitutional reform commissions and constitutional conventions, both historically and analytically. It arrives at the conclusion that very rigid constitutions are incompatible with the principle of intergenerational justice. Recurring constitutional reform commissions in fixed time intervals would give each generation of citizens a say without leaning too much to the side of flexibility.
Keywords Constitutional Theory  Constitutional Philosophy  Political Theory,  Generational Change  Thomas Jefferson  Intergenerational Justice  Intergenerational Sovereignty
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/raju.12233
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Treatises of Government.Roland Hall - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):365.
Libertarianism Without Inequality.Michael Otsuka - 2003 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Idea of a Living Constitution.Dr Aileen Kavanagh - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 16 (1):55-89.
The Problems of Correction of the Official Constitutional Doctrine.Egidijus Jarašiūnas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):39-70.
What Are Constitutions, and What Should (and Can) They Do?Larry Alexander - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):1-24.
A Theory of Judicial Constitutional Design.Roberto Mancilla - 2017 - International Journal of Political Theory 2 (1):64-88.
Autonomous Constitutional Interpretation.Tomasz Stawecki - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (4):505-535.
Freedom and Permission The Constitutional Concepts of the Freedom of the Individual.Andras Bragyova - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):379-408.
Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning.David Lyons - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):75.
Constitutional Identity.Gary J. Jacobsohn - 2010 - Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-22

Total views
79 ( #134,641 of 2,445,506 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #67,769 of 2,445,506 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes