Ekaterini Kaleri
University of Patras
In logic books ordinary language examples are often thought to be easier to understand, as it is presupposed or suggested, that their logical structure is obvious. This suggestion is not only incorrect; moreover, as this paper shows , the alleged simplification in fact entails additional problems: The notion of 'logical structure' remains vague, and confusion between the logical features of statements and the grammatical properties of ordinary language sentences is invoked; some arbitrariness and circles in the presentation are also inevitable. It would be more helpful to clearly state the conventional character of logical systems as well as to stress the importance of semantical analysis in order to find out the logical structure of statements
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01803800
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,044,191 of 2,455,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,855 of 2,455,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes