Sophia 49 (2):261-269 (2010)
AbstractF.W.J. von Schelling’s positive philosophy of mythology and revelation questions how one can move from the natural (the negative or mythology) to freedom (the positive or revelation), i.e. from the natural to the supernatural. The move from nature to freedom surpasses the traditional metaphysics of presence. Being is not simply the presencing of nature but the result of a decisive deed surpassing and supplementing nature. Nature can do nothing other than presence. Freedom, however, could also not be. It could remain in concealment and must not necessarily presence as nature does. The origin is a supplement because an unnecessary excess extraneous to nature. In other words, origins always supplement the natural, i.e. they are supernatural and revelatory. Origins bring something novel, i.e. something original, into being but origins themselves remain in non-being and consequently remain un-revealed. The origin cannot exist, i.e. cannot become present, because it is always qualitatively Past. The origin never was but always already has been . Primal repetition was freedom’s subjection of nature to the Past and a deferral of this deed’s consequences to the indefinite Future.
Similar books and articles
In Search of Ground: Schelling on God, Freedom, and the Existence of Evil.Mark J. Thomas - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:99-111.
The theory of natural beauty and its evil star: Kant, Hegel, Adorno.Rodolphe Gasché - 2002 - Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):103-122.
From a philosophy of self to a philosophy of nature: Goethe and the development of Schelling's naturphilosophie.Dalia Nassar - 2010 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):304-321.
Devin Zane Shaw, Freedom and Nature in Schelling's Philosophy of Art. [REVIEW]Jeremy Proulx - 2011 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 15 (2):223-226.
Philosophical Inquiries into the Nature of Human Freedom.Friedrich W. Schelling (ed.) - 1936 - Open Court.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Attractiveness of Panentheism—a Reply to Benedikt Paul Göcke.Raphael Lataster - 2014 - Sophia 53 (3):389-395.