The Causal Attainment Theory of Temporal Passage

Sorites 10:60-73 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers contend that the notion of temporal passage is illusory. But if the flow of time is an illusion, what gives rise to the notion that an event is in the future and then becomes present? In this paper, I hypothesize that there is a relation between the degree to which the conditions necessary for an event to occur have been met and the perception that a future event is “distant” or “near” in time. An event is perceived to be “distant” when few or none of the conditions necessary to cause the event have been met. As the conditions necessary to cause the event are attained, the event is perceived to be “near” or “about to happen.” This hypothesis would explain the perception that an event “moves” from the future to the present, but it would not explain why an event that has occurred seems to move from the near past into the distant past.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
85 (#146,043)

6 months
14 (#70,557)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Direction of Time.Hans Reichenbach - 1956 - Dover Publications.
The unreality of time.John Ellis McTaggart - 1908 - Mind 17 (68):457-474.
Scientific Thought.C. D. Broad - 1923 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.

View all 30 references / Add more references