Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):303-304 (2014)

Authors
J. D. Trout
Loyola University, Chicago
Abstract
In “Forced to be Free”, Neil Levy surveys the raft of documented decision-making biases that humans are heir to, and advances several bold proposals designed to enhance the patient's judgment. Gratefully, Levy is moved by the psychological research on judgment and decision-making that documents people's inaccuracy when identifying courses of action will best promote their subjective well-being. But Levy is quick to favour the patient's present preferences, to ensure they get “final say” about their treatment. I urge the opposite inclination, raising doubts about whether the patient's “present preferences” are the best expression of their “final say”. When there is adequate evidence that people, by their own lights, overemphasize their present preferences about the future, we should carefully depreciate those preferences, in effect biasing them to make the right decision by their own lights
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100426
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Forced to Be Free? Increasing Patient Autonomy by Constraining It.Neil Levy - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):293-300.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Independence of Δ1n.Amir Leshem & Menachem Magidor - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):350 - 362.
Non-Voluntary Compliance.Steven Jay Gold - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:115-120.
Blindsight and Visual Awareness.Paul Azzopardi & Alan Cowey - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):292-311.
Paternalism and Democracy.Marion Smiley - 1989 - Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
Apparent Paradoxes in Moral Reasoning; Or How You Forced Him to Do It, Even Though He Wasn’T Forced to Do It.Jonathan Phillips & Liane Young - 2011 - Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society:138-143.
The Paradox of Moral Focus.Liane Young & Jonathan Phillips - 2011 - Cognition 119 (2):166-178.
Reconsidering the Tradition of Metaphysics.Ludger Honnefelder - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:1-13.
Sorites Paradoxes and the Transition Question.Mark Sainsbury - 1992 - Philosophical Papers 21 (3):177-190.
The Power to Make Others Worship.Aaron Smuts - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (2):221 - 237.
Forced Assistance.Gerhard Øverland - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (2):203 - 232.
What Can We Be Forced to Do?Gerald Dworkin - 1991 - Journal of Social Philosophy 22 (2):40-48.
Anti-Slavery International.Mary Cunneen - 2005 - Journal of Global Ethics 1 (1):85 – 92.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-14

Total views
36 ( #302,863 of 2,455,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes