Polis 27 (2):292-307 (2010)
AbstractDeparting from Aristotle's two-fold definition of anthropos as having logos and being political, the argument of this article is that human beings are always fundamentally political for Aristotle. This position challenges the view that ethical life is prior to or beyond the scope of political life. Aristotle's conception of the political nature of the human is developed through a reading of the linguistic argument at Politics I.2; a careful treatment of autos, or self, in Aristotle; and an examination of the political nature of anthropos in the context of Aristotle's candidates for the best life in Politics VII.1-3 and Nicomachean Ethics X.6-8. From this consideration the compatibility between Aristotle's claims that anthropos is fundamentally political and that the highest end of the human is achieved in theoria is maintained, since even in pursuing the theoretic life, human beings take up the practical question of what the best life is
Similar books and articles
Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle's Politics.Fred Dycus Miller - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Logos as Kinesis: Heidegger’s Interpretation of the Physics in Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie.Charlotta Weigelt - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):101-116.
Whose Prayer? The Best Regime of Book 7 and the Lessons of Aristotle's "Politics".Stephen Salkever - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (1):29 - 46.
Human nature and political conventions.Christopher J. Berry - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):95-111.
Aristotle's "Politics": A Symposium: Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue.Julia Annas - 1996 - Review of Metaphysics 49 (4):731 - 753.
The Politics of Philosophy: A Commentary on Aristotle's Politics.Michael Davis - 1996 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads