Rule in Turn

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):301-311 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Aristotle’s political theory is often dismissed as undemocratic due to his treatment of natural slavery and women and to his conception of political rule as rule by turns. The second reason presents no less serious challenges than the first for finding democracy in Aristotle’s political theory. This article argues that Aristotle’s account of ruling in turns hinges on a critique of master rule and an affirmation of political rule, which involves both the rulers and the ruled in the project of ruling. Ruling in turns makes the rule shared, not merely an exchange of opportunities to rule as a despot.

Similar books and articles

The Three Dimensions of Aristotle's Political Ideology.Paul Bullen - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago
Democracy and Justice in Aristotle's "Politics".Robert Alan Goldberg - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Norberto Bobbio: The Rule of Law and the Rule of Democracy.Richard Bellamy - 2011 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 3 (5):53-59.
Whether there is the Golden Rule in Aristotle’s Ethics?Ruben Apressyan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:9-15.
Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.


Added to PP

362 (#56,309)

6 months
71 (#68,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aristotle's conception of freedom.Moira M. Walsh - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (4):495-507.

Add more references