Descartes and the Possibility of Science [Book Review]
Dialogue 41 (4):817-818 (2002)
AbstractThere are a good many insights in Schouls’s book, which is definitely not for first-time readers of the Meditations but for scholars who think they know it all. After reading Schouls’s essay, they will find, however, that where theirs was a vague, mostly negative notion of the understanding, gathered from the famous “wax example,” as the faculty which provides the information the senses can not, Schouls offers a detailed model of the faculty of the pure understanding. In this essay, Schouls has wrought a delicate piece in which each element of the Cartesian clockwork kicks in at the right time to result in a system in which it is the human mind’s nature to bring about progress through science and in which the human essence, mind, ultimately expressed in the freedom of the will, is best realized in science. One drawback that can perhaps be pointed out already is that Schouls makes the Meditations sound like a transcendental argument in favour of the pursuit of science: scientific certainty exists, what does human nature have to be like for this to be possible?, etc. True, Descartes did mean the Meditations to be the foundation for science so that we can “make ourselves, as it were, the lords and masters of nature”, but it was not his intention to start from the premise that Science is possible. He thought he was establishing whether any certainty whatsoever could be achieved.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Descartes’ Cogito: Saved From the Great Shipwreck. [REVIEW]Mireille Truong - 2005 - Dialogue 44 (3):597-599.
Descartes Et L’Ambivalence de la Création. [REVIEW]Mireille Truong - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (2):391-393.
Descartes, Hobbes and The Body of Natural Science.Tom Sorell - 1988 - The Monist 71 (4):515-525.
Kant and the Possibility of a Science of Psychology.Theodore Mischel - 1967 - The Monist 51 (4):599-622.
Formal Causation and the Explanation of Intentionality in Descartes.Amy M. Schmitter - 1996 - The Monist 79 (3):368-387.
Some of Descartes' Debts to Eustachius A Sancto Paulo.Frederick P. Van De Pitte - 1988 - The Monist 71 (4):487-497.
Descartes, The Aristotelians, and The Revolution That Did Not Happen In 1637.Daniel Garber - 1988 - The Monist 71 (4):471-486.
John Sergeant: A Forgotten Critic of Descartes and Locke.Norman C. Bradish - 1929 - The Monist 39 (4):571-628.
The Need and Possibility of an Imperativistic Ethics.G. T. W. Patrick - 1925 - The Monist 35 (2):183-199.