Is ‘new’ behavioral economics ‘mainstream’?

Journal of Economic Methodology 25 (1):83-104 (2018)

Abstract
When comparing ‘new’ and ‘old’ behavioral economics, many argue that ‘new’ BE has close ties with what is often called ‘mainstream’ economics. The aim of this paper is to reframe the ‘old’ vs. ‘new’ BE debate and investigate the nature of the relationship between psychologists, behavioral economists, and ‘mainstream’ economists. This will lead us to develop the concept of ‘space of interaction’, building on Galison’s metaphor of ‘trading zones’, to emphasize the role of outsiders, strategic thinking, and negotiation in ‘new’ BE. By discussing some often implicit arguments in an otherwise disconnected literature, we seek to bring new arguments to the discussions through a careful study of those relationships in the history of ‘new’ BE and its more recent developments. Leaving aside the orthodox/heterodox contrast and comparative approaches, we hope to provide a different account of the changes in ‘new’ BE and its relationship with the ‘mainstream’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1080/1350178x.2017.1407436
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,365
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.Harry Collins, Robert Evans & Mike Gorman - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (4):657-666.
Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.Amos Tversky - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (4):281-299.
Orthodox and Heterodox Economics in Recent Economic Methodology.D. Wade Hands - 2015 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):61.
Unifying the Behavioral Sciences II.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):45-53.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Succeeding But Not Subversion: From Classical to Neoclassical and to Behavioral Economics.Jing-Tong He & Yi Na - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:122-130.
Behavioral Economics: A History.Floris Heukelom - 2014 - Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Explanatory Pluralism in Economics: Against the Mainstream?Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):299-315.
The Unbearable Lightness of the Economics-Made-Fun Genre.Peter Spiegler - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):283-301.
The Development of Environmental Thinking in Economics.C. Spash - 1999 - Environmental Values 8 (4):413-435.
Interdependent Preferences and Policy Stances in Mainstream Economics.François Claveau - 2009 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-06

Total views
18 ( #479,587 of 2,271,724 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #564,635 of 2,271,724 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature