Instruments of health and harm: how the procurement of healthcare goods contributes to global health inequality

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (6):423-429 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many healthcare goods, such as surgical instruments, textiles and gloves, are manufactured in unregulated factories and sweatshops where, amongst other labour rights violations, workers are subject to considerable occupational health risks. In this paper we undertake an ethical analysis of the supply of sweatshop-produced surgical goods to healthcare providers, with a specific focus on the National Health Service of the United Kingdom. We contend that while labour abuses and occupational health deficiencies are morally unacceptable in the production of any commodity, an additional wrong is incurred when the health of certain populations is secured in ways that endanger the health and well-being of people working and living elsewhere. While some measures have been taken to better regulate the supply chain to healthcare providers in the UK, further action is needed to ensure that surgical goods are sourced from suppliers who protect the labour and occupational health rights of their workers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,960

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Global Health Justice and the Right to Health.Heather Widdows - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (4):391-400.
The Ethics of Aggressive Discharge Planning.Alister Browne - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-25

Downloads
31 (#741,750)

6 months
11 (#379,489)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arianne Shahvisi
Brighton And Sussex Medical School