Scrambling for higher metrics in the Journal Impact Factor bubble period: a real-world problem in science management and its implications

Abstract

Universities and funders in many countries have been using Journal Impact Factor (JIF) as an indicator for research and grant assessment despite its controversial nature as a statistical representation of scientific quality. This study investigates how the changes of JIF over the years can affect its role in research evaluation and science management by using JIF data from annual Journal Citation Reports (JCR) to illustrate the changes. The descriptive statistics find out an increase in the median JIF for the top 50 journals in the JCR, from 29.300 in 2017 to 33.162 in 2019. Moreover, on average, elite journal families have up to 27 journals in the top 50. In the group of journals with a JIF of lower than 1, the proportion has shrunk by 14.53% in the 2015–2019 period. The findings suggest a potential ‘JIF bubble period’ that science policymaker, university, public fund managers, and other stakeholders should pay more attention to JIF as a criterion for quality assessment to ensure more efficient science management.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-10

Downloads
175 (#69,277)

6 months
28 (#31,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Manh-Toan Ho
Phenikaa University
Quan-Hoang Vuong
Phenikaa University

References found in this work

The Disaster of the Impact Factor.Khaled Moustafa - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):139-142.
The Question of Quality.Phuong-Thao T. Trinh, Thu-Hien T. Le, Thu-Trang Vuong & Phuong-Hanh Hoang - 2019 - In Quan-Hoang Vuong & Trung Tran (eds.), The Vietnamese Social Sciences at a Fork in the Road. Warsaw, Poland: De Gruyter. pp. 121-142.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful.Gonzalo Génova, Hernán Astudillo & Anabel Fraga - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):227-235.
The Disaster of the Impact Factor.Khaled Moustafa - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):139-142.
Vol 1, Iss 1, July 2013.Merc Global - 2013 - MERC Global's International Journal of Management 1 (1):01-85.
Foreword.F. R. D. - 1979 - Journal of Biosocial Science 11 (1):1-2.
Science Bubbles.David Budtz Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (4):503-518.