Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124 (2011)
In his famous argument for the unreality of time, McTaggart claims that i) being past, being present, and being future are incompatible properties of an event, yet ii) every event admits all these three properties. In this paper, I examine two key concepts involved in the formulation of i) and ii), namely that of “validity” and that of “contradiction”, and for each concept I distinguish a static version and a dynamic version of it. I then arrive at three different ways of formulating McTaggart’s claims that avoid the notorious McTaggart’s Paradox. So long as we demand that McTaggart make clear use/mention and token/type distinctions in his claims, we shall find that it is indeed very difficult for him to get a genuine contradiction from i) and ii).
|Keywords||McTaggart’s Paradox Incompatibility Thesis All-inclusive Thesis static contradiction dynamic contradiction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Logical Structure of the Debate About McTaggart's Paradox.Quentin Smith - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:371-379.
Mctaggart's Paradox and Smith's Tensed Theory of Time.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1996 - Synthese 107 (2):205 - 221.
Fine's Mctaggart, Temporal Passage, and the a Versus B‐Debate.Natalja Deng - 2013 - Ratio 26 (1):19-34.
Category Theory Applied to a Radically New but Logically Essential Description of Time and Space.Dr John Yates - 2008 - Cogprints.
The Reality of Now.William Seager - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.
The View From Nowhen: The Mctaggart-Dummett Argument for the Unreality of Time.Kevin Falvey - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):297-312.
Added to index2011-07-20
Total downloads46 ( #113,069 of 2,168,630 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,816 of 2,168,630 )
How can I increase my downloads?