How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood

Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):44-50 (2001)

Abstract
The modern doctor-patient relationship displays a patient-centred, mutual-participation characteristic rather than the former active-passive or guidance-cooperation models in terms of medical decision making. Respecting the wishes of patients, amounting to more than mere concern for their welfare, has become the feature central to certain modern bioethics theories. A group of ethical principles such as respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice has been proposed by bioethicists and widely adopted by many medical societies as an ethical guide to how doctors, in their daily practice, should treat their patients. However, seeing patients as persons who are rational, self-conscious beings capable of valuing their own lives, and who are consequently entitled to the liberty and rights to choose for themselves, is in general the backbone of Western bioethical principles.Since Confucian philosophy has long been a representative of the East-Asia cultural tradition and Confucian bioethics has recently been developed as a theory of applied ethics, examining Confucius's idea of “persons” may shed some light on the current bioethical debates. Confucius's concept of persons, which is best interpreted via his theories of “chun-tze”, encapsulating a two-dimensional approach, , provides a more comprehensive model regarding what a person is and how he/she should be treated. This two-dimensional approach sees a person not only as a rational, autonomous agent but also as a relational, altruistic identity whose self actualisation involves incessant participating in and promoting of the welfare of his fellow persons. Hence this may balance the current bioethical trend whereby “respect for autonomy” often triumphs
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.27.1.44
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy.Wing-tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Foundations of Bioethics.H. T. Engelhardt - 1986 - Ethics 98 (2):402-405.
Confucius--The Secular as Sacred.Henry Rosemont - 1976 - Philosophy East and West 26 (4):463-477.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Bioethical Principles and Confucius' Moral Philosophy.D. F.-C. Tsai - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):159-163.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Split Brains and Singular Personhood.John D. Greenwood - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):285-306.
A Confucian View of Personhood and Bioethics.Erika Yu & Ruiping Fan - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):171-179.
Split-Brains and Singular Personhood.John D. Greenwood - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):285-306.
Conscientious Refusal and a Doctors's Right to Quit.John K. Davis - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):75 – 91.
Personhood and Animals.Elisa Aaltola - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (2):175-193.
A Necessary Inhumanity?R. Richardson - 2000 - Medical Humanities 26 (2):104-106.
Medical Mismanagement or Public Vacillation?P. N. Bamford - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):179-181.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
36 ( #251,790 of 2,285,998 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #157,741 of 2,285,998 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature