Attention and memory-driven effects in action studies

Authors
Timothy Joseph Lane
Taipei Medical College
Abstract
: We provide empirical examples to conceptually clarify some items on Firestone & Scholl’s (F&S’s) checklist, and to explain perceptual effects from an attentional and memory perspective. We also note that action and embodied cognition studies seem to be most susceptible to misattributing attentional and memory effects as perceptual, and identify four characteristics unique to action studies and possibly responsible for misattributions.
Keywords embodied cognition  attention  memory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X15002575
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Memory and Materiality.Katrina Schlunke - 2013 - Memory Studies 6:253-261.
Cognitive Penetration and Attention.Steven Gross - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-05

Total views
67 ( #102,154 of 2,312,938 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #72,394 of 2,312,938 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature