Argumentation 25 (4):427-447 (2011)

Abstract
In this paper, I explore the potential of systematically studying the linguistic surface of discourse for the purposes of identifying markers of argumentative moves and other related categories, such as types of arguments and argumentative strategies. Such a list of argumentative markers can prove useful for the (semi)automatic treatment of a large corpus of texts. After reviewing literature on the linguistic realization of argumentative moves as well as literature on the subject of discourse markers, it becomes clear that the search for representative items of argumentative markers cannot be restricted to those elements marking relations but that it should also include elements that signal a certain function that is of pertinence to argumentative analysis. In this view, argumentative markers can be any single or complex lexical expression as well as a discursive configuration whose presence in a given utterance marks that utterance or the one preceding/following it, or a larger piece of discourse as having a certain argumentative function (as an argumentative move, a type of argument or an argumentative strategy). Examples taken from a French corpus on the controversy surrounding the development and applications of nanotechnology currently under study are used to illustrate the different types of argumentative markers proposed
Keywords Argumentative markers  Pragmatic markers  Discourse markers  Corpus analysis  Computer-assisted methods for argumentative analysis  Argumentation studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9215-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Book Review. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):519-524.
L'argumentation dans la langue.Jean-Claude Anscombre & Oswald Ducrot - 1984 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 174 (1):111-112.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Practice of Argumentative Discussion.David Hitchcock - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):287-298.
Evaluating Argumentative Moves in Medical Consultations.Sarah Bigi - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):51-65.
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound?Paola Cantù - 2007 - In H. V. Hanson (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference: Dissensus & The Search for Common Ground. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1--9.
Argumentative Injustice.Patrick Bondy - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):263-278.
The Argumentative Aspects of Skill and Skilled Activity.David Holman - 1999 - Emergence: Complexity and Organization 1 (3):51-63.
The Argumentative Tradition in Indian Philosophy.Balaganapathi Devarakonda - 2008-09 - Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Traditions 5:173-186.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-14

Total views
54 ( #199,030 of 2,454,613 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,613 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes