Rhizomata 9 (2):179-201 (2021)

Authors
Voula Tsouna
University of California at Santa Barbara
Abstract
The surviving writings of Epicurus and his followers contain several references to epibolê – a puzzling notion that does not receive discussion in the extant Epicurean texts. There is no consensus about what epibolê is, what it is of, and what it operates on and, moreover, its epistemological status is controversial. This article aims to address these issues in both Epicurus and later Epicurean authors. Part One focuses mainly on Epicurus’ Letter to Herodotus, highlights a crucial distinction hitherto unnoticed in the literature between two different types of epibolê, and brings out he necessary connection between epibolê and the application of the criteria of truth. Part Two considers the philosophical merits of the traditional interpretation of epibolê as projection and/or attention. Part Three examines the two aforementioned types of epibolê in Lucretius and Philodemus and shows that these authors accord epibolê paramount epistemological and ethical importance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/rhiz-2021-0011
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Attention.Christopher Mole - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics.Gisela Striker (ed.) - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle on the Imagination.Malcolm Schofield - 1992 - In Martha Craven Nussbaum & Amélie Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle's de Anima. Oxford University Press. pp. 249--77.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philodemus, Seneca and Plutarch on Anger.Voula Tsouna - 2011 - In Jeffrey Fish & Kirk R. Sanders (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 183-210.
Epicurean Virtues, Epicurean Friendship: Cicero Vs. The Herculaneum Papyri.David Armstrong - 2011 - In Jeffrey Fish & Kirk R. Sanders (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 105-128.
Three Studies in Epicurean Cosmology.F. A. Bakker - 2010 - Dissertation, Utrecht University
Rationality and the Fear of Death in Epicurean Philosophy.Voula Tsouna - 2006 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 1:79-117.
Ancora su Timasagora epicureo.Francesco Verde - 2010 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 31 (2):285-317.
Epicurean Preconceptions.Voula Tsouna - 2016 - Phronesis 61 (2):160-221.
Epicurean Dreams.Voula Tsouna - 2018 - Elenchos 39 (2):231-256.
Epicurean Therapeutic Strategies.Voula Tsouna - 2009 - In James Warren (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 249-265.
Cicero's Use and Abuse of Epicurean Theology.Holger Essler - 2011 - In Jeffrey Fish & Kirk R. Sanders (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 129-151.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-12-04

Total views
8 ( #1,010,425 of 2,519,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #116,787 of 2,519,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes