Dialogue 45 (4):627-46 (2006)
It is commonly assumed, at least by continental philosophers, that epistemological hermeneutics and foundationalism are incompatible. I argue that this assumption is mistaken. If I am correct, the analytic and continental traditions may be closer than is commonly supposed. Hermeneutics, as I will argue, is a descriptive claim about human cognition, and foundationalism is a normative claim about how beliefs ought to be related to one another. Once the positions are stated in this way, their putative incompatibility vanishes. Also, to inspire further research I include an appendix which contains an unfinished prototype of a hermeneutic foundationalism
|Keywords||foundationalism hermeneutics continental epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What's NOT Wrong with Foundationalism.Michael Bergmann - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):161–165.
Foundationalism, Circular Justification, and the Levels Gambit.James A. Keller - 1986 - Synthese 68 (2):205 - 212.
Memory Foundationalism and the Problem of Unforgotten Carelessness.Robert Schroer - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):74–85.
Hermeneutics and Postmodernism: Can We Have a Radical Reader-Response Theory? Part II.Paul R. Noble - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):1 - 22.
Faith After Foundationalism: Plantinga-Rorty-Lindbeck-Berger: Critiques and Alternatives.D. Z. Phillips - 1988 - Westview Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #108,077 of 2,143,476 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,274 of 2,143,476 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.