Res Publica 18 (3):225-240 (2012)

Authors
Adam Tucker
University of York
Abstract
It is common to encounter the criticism that Joseph Raz’s service conception of authority is flawed because it appears to justify too much. This essay examines the extent to which the service conception accommodates this critique. Two variants of this critical strategy are considered. The first, exemplified by Kenneth Einar Himma, alleges that the service conception fails to conceptualize substantive limits on the legitimate exercise of authority. This variant fails; Raz has elucidated substantive limits on jurisdiction within the service conception of authority, albeit reluctantly and equivocally. The second, exemplified by Scott Hershovitz, alleges that the service conception fails to conceptualize procedural limits on the legitimate exercise of authority. He objects that the normal justification thesis fails to deny legitimacy to rational and expert dictators. This argument is more potent, but its force is concealed when it is aimed at the normal justification thesis rather than the quite separate jurisdictional limits of Raz’s theory. Clarifying those jurisdictional aspects of the service conception shows why the first argument fails and exposes the real strength of the second. Both variants have important consequences for our understanding of the service conception
Keywords Authority  Legitimacy  Joseph Raz  Democracy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-012-9180-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,842
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Law and Disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Law and Disagreement.Arthur Ripstein & Jeremy Waldron - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):611.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Survey Article: The Legitimacy of International Courts.Andreas Follesdal - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (4):476-499.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Authority.Scott Hershovitz - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.
Raz on Authority and Democracy.David Rondel - 2012 - Dialogue 51 (2):211-230.
Authority, Accountability, and Preemption.Stephen Darwall - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):103-119.
Autonomy, Authority, and Answerability.Andrea C. Westlund - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):161-179.
Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority.Christopher S. King - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-02-18

Total views
51 ( #203,747 of 2,438,913 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,842 of 2,438,913 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes