In Mark White (ed.), Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics. Cambridge University Press (2009)

Mark Tunick
Florida Atlantic University
This paper points to some limitations of law and economics as both an explanative and a normative theory. In explaining law as the result of efficiency promoting decisions, law and economics theorists often dismiss the reasons actors in the legal system give for their behavior. Recognizing that sometimes actors may be unaware of why institutions evolve as they do, I argue that the case for dismissing reasons for action is weaker when those reasons make reference to rules of practices that constitute the meaning of actions within those practices, or when they have otherwise been given well-considered defenses. In criticizing law and economics as a normative theory, I acknowledge that economic considerations are often important in deciding how to act in the personal sphere and how government should allocate its scarce resources. I argue that while the use of institutions to promote our ideals forces us to take their costs into account, it is a mistake to infer from this that the question of determining social policy is a purely economic problem, and that we should acknowledge the non-utilitarian moral ideals our law and practices promote. This is the basis of both an internal criticism--law and economics theorists have not sufficiently evaluated and weighed the value of fairness and other ideals in their utility calculations--and an external criticism-- these ideals are important in ways that can not be measured in utiles.
Keywords law and economics  utilitarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Crime and Punishment.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Latest Results.
Two Concepts of Rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Two Concepts of Rules.John Rawls & Andrei Korbut - 2013 - Russian Sociological Review 12 (2):16-40.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Morality of Law and Economics.Russell Hardin - 1992 - Law and Philosophy 11 (4):331 - 384.
A Methodological Note on Ethics, Economics, and the Justification of Action.Hans-Peter Weikard - 1992 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):183-188.
Androids and Agents: Do We Need a Non‐Computational Economics?Wolfram Latsch - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):375-396.
Can Economics Rank Slavery Against Free Labor in Terms of Efficiency?Lawrence H. White - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):327-340.


Added to PP index

Total views
103 ( #88,025 of 2,325,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #29,577 of 2,325,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes