Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (3):259-277 (2000)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This article addresses the question of whether an expectation of privacy is reasonable in the face of new technologies of surveillance, by developing a principle that best fits our intuitions. A "no sense enhancement" principle which would rule out searches using technologically sophisticated devices is rejected. The paper instead argues for the "mischance principle," which proscribes uses of technology that reveal what could not plausibly be discovered accidentally without the technology, subject to the proviso that searches that serve a great public good that clearly outweighs minimal intrusions upon privacy are permissible. Justifications of the principle are discussed, including reasons why we should use the principle and not rely solely on a utilitarian balancing test. The principle is applied to uses of aerial photography and heat-detection devices.
|
Keywords | Privacy Technology |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why?Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215.
Privacy in Public Places: Do GPS and Video Surveillance Provide Plain Views?Mark Tunick - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):597-622.
Similar books and articles
Protecting Privacy in Public? Surveillance Technologies and the Value of Public Places.Jason W. Patton - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):181-187.
PETs and their users: a critical review of the potentials and limitations of the privacy as confidentiality paradigm. [REVIEW]Seda Gürses - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):539-563.
Navigating Computer Science Research Through Waves of Privacy Concerns.Latanya Sweeney - 2004 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 34 (1 special issue):1-18.
The Difference Between Lonely Old Ladies and CCTV Cameras: A Response to Ryberg.Benjamin Goold - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (1):43-47.
Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet.Seumas Miller & John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Surveillance, Privacy and the Ethics of Vehicle Safety Communication Technologies.M. Zimmer - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):201-210.
Privacy at Work – Ethical Criteria.Anders J. Persson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):59 - 70.
Privacy in Public Places: Do GPS and Video Surveillance Provide Plain Views?Mark Tunick - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):597-622.
Are New Technologies the Enemy of Privacy?Amitai Etzioni - 2007 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20 (2):115-119.
Facing the Future: Seeking Ethics for Everyday Surveillance. [REVIEW]David Lyon - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (3):171-180.
Privacy, Democracy and the Politics of Disease Surveillance.Amy L. Fairchild, Ronald Bayer & James Colgrove - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (1):30-38.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-19
Total views
63 ( #181,154 of 2,504,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #60,503 of 2,504,868 )
2014-01-19
Total views
63 ( #181,154 of 2,504,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #60,503 of 2,504,868 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads