Berkeley, CA: University of California (1992)

Mark Tunick
Florida Atlantic University
Unlike other treatments of legal punishment, this book takes both an external approach, asking why we punish at all, and an internal approach, considering issues faced by those 'inside' the practice: For what actions should we punish? Should we allow plea-bargaining? the insanity defense? How should sentencing be determined? The two approaches are connected: To decide whether to punish someone who is 'insane', or who cops a plea, we need to ask whether doing so is consistent with our theory of why we punish at all. In connecting theory and practice, I draw on a broad range of thought: radical criticisms of punishment (Nietzsche, Foucault, Marxists), sociological theories (Durkheim, Girard), various philosophical traditions (utilitarian, German Idealism, modern liberalism), and the 'law and economics' movement. Against radical critics who argue we shouldn't punish at all, but who then leave us without an alternative for dealing with crime, I defend the practice, offering a version of retribution (which I distinguish from revenge and non-consequential theories) that holds we punish not to deter, reform, or otherwise augment social utility, but to mete out just deserts, vindicate right, and express society's condemnation of actions it deems blameworthy. I argue that this theory best accounts for how we do punish, and then use this theory to provide immanent criticism of certain features of our actual practice that don't accord with the retributive principle.
Keywords punishment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $6.29 used   $63.00 new   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 0520077377   9780520077379
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Value of Vengeance and the Demand for Deterrence.Molly J. Crockett, Yagiz Özdemir & Ernst Fehr - 2014 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (6):2279-2286.
Principles of Criminal Liability from the Semiotic Point of View.Michał Peno & Olgierd Bogucki - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (2):561-578.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2010 - Oxford Bibliographies Online.
A Sketch of an Integrative Theory of Punishment.Joel Kidder - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (2):197 - 202.
The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2012 - Routledge.
Legal Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2004 - In Christopher Roederer & Darrel Moellendorf (eds.), Jurisprudence. Juta. pp. 555-87.
Censure Theory and Intuitions About Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
Punishment and Justice.Jules Holroyd - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):78-111.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #408,027 of 2,505,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes