Authors
Mark Tunick
Florida Atlantic University
Abstract
A liberal pluralist state recognizes that its members exercise a variety of religions or hold diverse comprehensive doctrines, and strives for neutrality so that none is favored. Neutrality can come into tension with the demands of individuals to express their religion in public spaces. I focus on a display of a “finals tree,” that many regard as a Christmas tree, on the campus of a public university, a display objected to by a small minority of non-Christian faculty and students who claim it makes them ‘outsiders’ and should be removed. While display of a Christmas tree doesn’t violate the First Amendment because the Court has ruled it is a secular symbol, resolving that legal issue doesn’t resolve the ethical issue of which side should accommodate the other. To address that, I turn to traditional theories of Kant and Mill, who would side with the tree displayers, who are causing no harm and restricting no one else’s liberty. Finding this resolution wanting, I develop a modified version of Jeremy Waldron’s ‘adequacy’ principle, which has us be sensitive to the aims of others when our actions keep them from adequately pursuing their legitimate aims, so long as accommodating them does not keep us from adequately pursuing our own. I depart from Waldron in arguing that in assessing each side’s claims we should sometimes conduct a limited inquiry into the sincerity of one’s religious reasons, and this inquiry would not be incompatible with liberal pluralism’s requirement that we appeal to public reason.
Keywords religious freedom, liberal pluralism, toleration
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Idea Of An Overlapping Consensus.John Rawls - 1987 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7 (1):1-25.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberalism and Toleration.Jon Mahoney - 2020 - In Johannes Drerup and Gottfried Schweiger (ed.), Toleration and the Challenges to Liberalism. Routledge.
Jean Bodin and Religious Toleration.Sabrina P. Ramet - 2019 - The Politics and Religion Journal 13 (1):81-95.
Wolterstorff’s Problem of Almighty Toleration.Kevin Vallier - 2016 - Journal of Analytic Theology 4:387-389.
Religious Freedom in Latin America.Pablo A. Deiros - 1991 - Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 8 (2):12-15.
Castellio Vs. Spinoza on Religious Toleration.Edwin Curley - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:89-110.
Tradition and Prudence in Locke's Exceptions to Toleration.David J. Lorenzo - 2003 - American Journal of Political Science 47 (2):248-58.
Democracy, Equality and Toleration.Catriona McKinnon - 2007 - The Journal of Ethics 11 (2):125-146.
Toleration, Religion and Accommodation.Peter Jones - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):542-563.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-09

Total views
5 ( #1,203,194 of 2,506,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes