London and New York: Routledge (2019)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Through a series of texts and phone calls, Michelle Carter encouraged her boyfriend Conrad Roy to act on his suicidal thoughts, and after Roy killed himself, Carter was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. The case has received widespread attention, generating reactions ranging from rage at Ms. Carter to disbelief that she was convicted. An issue emphasized up to now is what it might mean for the First Amendment right of free speech if we hold that words can kill. In presenting the case against punishing Ms. Carter, I show how the free speech issue intertwines with several others: Should the intimate exchanges between Carter and Roy have remained private? While privacy is valuable, it should not be a shield for harmful conduct, but did Ms. Carter, through her words, cause harm? If she believed that suicide would relieve Conrad of unbearable suffering, did she even act badly? And should the fact that society judges an individual’s actions to be immoral mean that the individual should be legally punished? The case serves as a touchstone for addressing fundamental issues of political, moral and legal theory with implications broader than whether Ms. Carter goes to prison.
|
Keywords | privacy suicide punishment liberal pluralism freedom of speech retribution utilitarianism coercion causation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2020 |
Buy this book | $67.74 used Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 0367546426 0367197405 9780367546427 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Counterfactual Success Again: Response to Carter and Kramer: Keith Dowding and Martin Van Hees.Keith Dowding - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):97-103.
Overall Freedom and Constraint.Ian Hunt - 2001 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):131 – 147.
Biocentric Consequentialism, Pluralism, and ‘The Minimax Implication’: A Reply to Alan Carter: Robin Attfield.Robin Attfield - 2003 - Utilitas 15 (1):76-91.
Bureaucratic Respectful Equality.Christopher Nathan - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (4):147488511666002.
Crimina Carnis and Morally Obligatory Suicide.D. R. Cooley - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3):327-356.
Crimina Carnis and Morally Obligatory Suicide: Erratum.D. R. Cooley - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3):357-357.
Suicide and Freedom From Suffering in Schopenhauer’s “Die Welt Als Wille Und Vorstellung”.Christopher Roland Trogan - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):5-8.
How Changes in One's Preferences Can Affect One's Freedom : A Reply to Dowding and Van Hees: Ian Carter and Matthew H. Kramer.Ian Carter - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):81-96.
Balancing Privacy and Free Speech: Unwanted Attention in the Age of Social Media.Mark Tunick - 2014 - London: Routledge.
The Case for Physician Assisted Suicide: How Can It Possibly Be Proven? E. Dahl & N. Levy - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):335-338.
The Butterfly Dialogues: Postmodern Fables for Kids and Grown-Ups.Steven Carter - 2011 - Hamilton Books.
The Suicide Tourist Trap: Compromise Across Boundaries. [REVIEW]Richard Huxtable - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):327-336.
The Case for Physician Assisted Suicide: How Can It Possibly Be Proven?Edgar Dahl & Neil Levy - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):335-338.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-04-27
Total views
39 ( #290,858 of 2,506,051 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,268 of 2,506,051 )
2019-04-27
Total views
39 ( #290,858 of 2,506,051 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,268 of 2,506,051 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads