Raimo Tuomela
University of Helsinki
Summary The paper considers arguments for and against correction and elimination of the basic conceptual categories as well as theories of social science. It is argued that some correction of at least some basic social notions is called for. A great part of the paper consists in a conceptual investigation of such notion of correction in terms of different notions of corrective explanation
Keywords Conceptual revolution  corrective explanation  elimination
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01801212
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Perception and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars (ed.) - 1963 - New York: Humanities Press.
Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind.Adam Morton - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (2):299.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Critical Notices.Paul K. Moser, Attracta Ingram, Raimo Tuomela, Philip Pettit & Crispin Wright - 1994 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2 (2):287 – 341.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #334,927 of 2,462,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,321 of 2,462,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes