Authors
John Turri
University of Waterloo
Abstract
Professional philosophers say it’s obvious that a Gettier subject does not know. But experimental philosophers and psychologists have argued that laypeople and non-Westerners view Gettier subjects very differently, based on experiments where laypeople tend to ascribe knowledge to Gettier subjects. I argue that when effectively probed, laypeople and non-Westerners unambiguously agree that Gettier subjects do not know.
Keywords Epistemology  Gettier problem  Experimental philosophy  K=JTB  Knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowledge and Luck.John Turri, Wesley Buckwalter & Peter Blouw - 2015 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22 (2):378-390.

View all 50 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-02-05

Total views
248 ( #36,195 of 2,425,823 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #20,108 of 2,425,823 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes