A conspicuous art: putting Gettier to the test

Abstract
Professional philosophers say it’s obvious that a Gettier subject does not know. But experimental philosophers and psychologists have argued that laypeople and non-Westerners view Gettier subjects very differently, based on experiments where laypeople tend to ascribe knowledge to Gettier subjects. I argue that when effectively probed, laypeople and non-Westerners unambiguously agree that Gettier subjects do not know
Keywords Epistemology  Gettier problem  Experimental philosophy  K=JTB  Knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,838
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Knowledge and Suberogatory Assertion.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2013-02-05

Total downloads
131 ( #42,345 of 2,231,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #147,513 of 2,231,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature