A conspicuous art: putting Gettier to the test


Authors
John Turri
University of Waterloo
Abstract
Professional philosophers say it’s obvious that a Gettier subject does not know. But experimental philosophers and psychologists have argued that laypeople and non-Westerners view Gettier subjects very differently, based on experiments where laypeople tend to ascribe knowledge to Gettier subjects. I argue that when effectively probed, laypeople and non-Westerners unambiguously agree that Gettier subjects do not know
Keywords Epistemology  Gettier problem  Experimental philosophy  K=JTB  Knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,987
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowledge and Luck.John Turri, Wesley Buckwalter & Peter Blouw - 2015 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22 (2):378-390.

View all 42 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-02-05

Total views
176 ( #47,590 of 2,310,346 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #203,551 of 2,310,346 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature