A note on Popper's equation of simplicity with falsifiability

Abstract
Karl Popper equates simplicity with falsifiability. He develops his argument for this equation through a geometrical example. There is a flaw in his example, which undermines his claim that simplicity is falsifiability. I point out the flaw here.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/42.1.105
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,046
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Falsificationism and Statistical Learning Theory: Comparing the Popper and Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimensions.David Corfield, Bernhard Schölkopf & Vladimir Vapnik - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):51-58.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Popper's Account of Acceptability.R. G. Swinburne - 1971 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):167 – 176.
The Logical Status of Natural Laws.R. A. Sharpe - 1964 - Inquiry 7 (1-4):414-416.
Ceteris Paribus Clauses, Closure Clauses and Falsifiability.Ingvar Johansson - 1980 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 11 (1):16-22.
Popper, Falsifiability, and Evolutionary Biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

40 ( #122,499 of 2,126,920 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #393,631 of 2,126,920 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums