Intentional time inconsistency

Theory and Decision 86 (1):41-64 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We propose a theoretical model to explain the usage of time-inconsistent behavior as a strategy to exploit others when reputation and trust have secondary effects on the economic outcome. We consider two agents with time-consistent preferences exploiting common resources. Supposing that an agent is believed to have time-inconsistent preferences with probability p, we analyze whether she uses this misinformation when she has the opportunity to use it. Using the model originally provided by Levhari and Mirman (Bell J Econ 11(1):322–334, 1980), we determine the optimal degree of present bias that the agent would like to have while pretending to have time-inconsistent preferences and we provide the range of present-bias parameter under which deceiving is optimal. Moreover, by allowing the constant relative risk aversion class of utility form, we characterize the distinction between pretending to be naive and sophisticated.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-28

Downloads
427 (#55,580)

6 months
107 (#63,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 1992 - Behavior and Philosophy 20:89-94.
The chain store paradox.Reinhard Selten - 1978 - Theory and Decision 9 (2):127-159.
Picoeconomics. [REVIEW]Kent Bach - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):981-983.

Add more references