Synthese 198 (1):757-775 (2019)

Authors
John Turri
University of Waterloo
Abstract
Researchers have debated whether there is a relationship between a statement’s truth-value and whether it counts as a lie. One view is that a statement being objectively false is essential to whether it counts as a lie; the opposing view is that a statement’s objective truth-value is inessential to whether it counts as a lie. We report five behavioral experiments that use a novel range of behavioral measures to address this issue. In each case, we found evidence of a relationship. A statement’s truth-value affects how quickly people judge whether it is a lie. When people consider the matter carefully and are told that they might need to justify their answer, they are more likely to categorize a statement as a lie when it is false than when it is true. When given options that inhibit perspective-taking, people tend to not categorize deceptively motivated statements as lies when they are true, even though they still categorize them as lies when they are false. Categorizing a speaker as “lying” leads people to strongly infer that the speaker’s statement is false. People are more likely to spontaneously categorize a statement as a lie when it is false than when it is true. We discuss four different interpretations of relevant findings to date. At present, the best supported interpretation might be that the ordinary lying concept is a prototype concept, with falsity being a centrally important element of the prototypical lie.
Keywords lies  social cognition  perspective-taking  moral psychology  deception  speech acts  assertion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-018-02062-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Doing Without Concepts.Edouard Machery - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.Eleanor Rosch - 1975 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3):192-233.
The Definition of Lying and Deception.James Edwin Mahon - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What Is Lying.Don Fallis - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (1):29-56.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Folk Concept of Lying.Alex Wiegmann & Jörg Meibauer - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (8).
Lying and Knowing.Ben Holguín - 2019 - Synthese 198 (6):5351-5371.
Lying: Knowledge or Belief?Neri Marsili - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
True Lies and Moorean Redundancy.Alex Wiegmann & Emanuel Viebahn - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):13053-13066.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Logic Of Lying.Moses Òkè - 2006 - Sorites 17:27-30.
Lying as a Scalar Phenomenon.Neri Marsili - 2014 - In Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham & Elizabeth Leiss (eds.), "Certainty-uncertainty – and the attitudinal space in between”,. John Benjamins Publishing.
Two Definitions of Lying.James Edwin Mahon - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):211-230.
Variations on the Liar's Paradox.Joseph Agassi - 1964 - Studia Logica 15 (1):237-238.
How to Deal with Lying.Rachel Lynette - 2008 - Powerkids Press.
Lying with Conditionals.Roy Sorensen - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):820-832.
Discourse About the Future.Michael Clark - 1969 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 3:169-190.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-02

Total views
92 ( #120,565 of 2,462,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #30,051 of 2,462,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes