Authors
John Turri
University of Waterloo
Abstract
This paper applies speech-act theory to craft a new response to Pyrrhonian skepticism and diagnose its appeal. Carefully distinguishing between different levels of language-use and noting their interrelations can help us identify a subtle mistake in a key Pyrrhonian argument
Keywords assertion   persuasion   Pyrrhonism   knowledge   speech acts   skepticism   belief
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2013
DOI 10.1163/221057011x588037
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowledge and Suberogatory Assertion.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.
Knowledge and Suberogatory Assertion.John Turri - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):557-567.
Skeptical Appeal: The Source‐Content Bias.John Turri - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (5):307-324.
Neo-Pyrrhonism.Markus Lammenranta - 2018 - In Diego E. Machuca & Baron Reed (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 565-580.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-29

Total views
222 ( #36,912 of 2,340,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #7,744 of 2,340,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes