Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):43 – 53 (1985)
Austin's ?doctrine of the infelicities?, whereby performative utterances are vulnerable to the risk of failure, has been criticized for treating such a possibility as contingent rather than as necessary (and hence revelatory of the essential nature of speech acts). This paper seeks to trace out what is at stake for one who maintains Austin's position. It examines Austin's curious hypothetical history of the development of speech acts, which is found to resemble forms of social?contract theory, and the problem with this hypothetical history is shown to be that it presupposes as original the very properties that it sets out to explain. The argument is then made that Austin's technicalization of the conditions and context of speech acts displaces our attention from the deeper issue that both speech?act and contract theory are versions of a concern with making social action transparent, and both raise the perennial (and insoluble) problem of trust in human affairs
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Intersubjectivity and Critical Consciousness: Remarks on Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action.Gerhard Wagner & Heinz Zipprian - 1991 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):49 – 62.
Similar books and articles
On What Sort of Speech Act Wittgenstein's Investigations is and Why It Matters (the Philosophical Forum , XXVIII, No. 3, 1997).Justin Leiber - unknown
Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid.Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):47 - 66.
Speech Acts Without Propositions?Marina Sbisà - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads11 ( #406,858 of 2,177,875 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,247 of 2,177,875 )
How can I increase my downloads?