The role of training, alternative models, and logical necessity in determining confidence in syllogistic reasoning
Thinking and Reasoning 15 (1):69 – 100 (2009)
Prior research shows that reasoners' confidence is poorly calibrated (Shynkaruk & Thompson, 2006). The goal of the current experiment was to increase calibration in syllogistic reasoning by training reasoners on (a) the concept of logical necessity and (b) the idea that more than one representation of the premises may be possible. Training improved accuracy and was also effective in remedying some systematic misunderstandings about the task: those in the training condition were better at estimating their overall performance than those who were untrained. However, training was less successful in helping reasoners to discriminate which items are most likely to cause them difficulties. In addition we explored other variables that may affect confidence and accuracy, such as the number of models required to represent the problem and whether or not the presented conclusion was necessitated by the premises, possible given the premises, or impossible given the premises. These variables had systematically different relationships to confidence and accuracy. Thus, we propose that confidence in reasoning judgements is analogous to confidence in memory retrievals, in that they are inferentially derived from cues that are not diagnostic in terms of accuracy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Analytic Thinking: Do You Feel Like It?Valerie Thompson & Kinga Morsanyi - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):93-105.
Normative Benchmarks Are Useful for Studying Individual Differences in Reasoning.Edward Jn Stupple & Linden J. Ball - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):270-271.
Intuitive And Reflective Responses In Philosophy.Nick Byrd - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Colorado
Similar books and articles
Rarity, Pseudodiagnosticity and Bayesian Reasoning.Simon Venn, Jonathan Evans & Aidan Feeney - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):209-230.
Bodily Limits to Autonomy : Emotion, Attitude, and Self-Defense.Sylvia Burrow - 2009 - In Sue Campbell, Letitia Meynell & Susan Sherwin (eds.), Embodiment and Agency. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Solving Categorical Syllogisms with Singular Premises.Hugo Mercier & Guy Politzer - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):434-454.
Individual Differences and the Belief Bias Effect: Mental Models, Logical Necessity, and Abstract Reasoning.Donna Torrens - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (1):1 – 28.
Confidence and Accuracy of Near-Threshold Discrimination Responses.Craig Kunimoto, Jeff G. Miller & Harold Pashler - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (3):294-340.
Individual Differences in Strategies for Syllogistic Reasoning.Alison Bacon, Simon Handley & Stephen Newstead - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (2):133 – 168.
The Transitive Task Revisited: Investigating Key Hallmarks From the Start to the End of Training.Barlow Wright - 2006 - Thinking and Reasoning 12 (1):91 – 123.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads53 ( #99,911 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,516 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?