Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment

Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315 (1983)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.
Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Interpretation Psychologized.A. Goldman - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (3):161-85.

View all 332 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total downloads
12 ( #444,855 of 2,267,113 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #210,707 of 2,267,113 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature