Argument maps improve critical thinking

Teaching Philosophy 27 (2):95--116 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Computer-based argument mapping greatly enhances student critical thinking, more than tripling absolute gains made by other methods. I describe the method and my experience as an outsider. Argument mapping often showed precisely how students were erring (for example: confusing helping premises for separate reasons), making it much easier for them to fix their errors.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,903 (#4,922)

6 months
197 (#14,241)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles R. Twardy
George Mason University

References found in this work

Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Studies in the Way of Words.D. E. Over - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (160):393-395.
Reasoning.Michael Scriven - 1976 - New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

View all 6 references / Add more references