Minerva 50 (2):149-167 (2012)

Science and technology policy is both faced by unprecedented challenges and itself undergoing seismic shifts. First, policy is increasingly demanding of science that it fixes a set of epochal and global crises. On the other hand, practices of scientific research are changing rapidly regarding geographical dispersion, the institutions and identities of those involved and its forms of knowledge production and circulation. Furthermore, these changes are accelerated by the current upheavals in public funding of research, higher education and technology development in the wake of the economic crisis. The paper outlines an agenda for science & technology policy studies in terms of a research programme of a ‘cultural political economy of research and innovation’ (CPERI). First, the implications of the overlapping crises for science policy analysis are discussed. Secondly, three rough constellations of contemporary approaches to science policy are critically compared, namely: a techno-statist Keynesian governance; a neoliberal marketplace of ideas; and co-productionist enabling of democratic debate. CPERI is then introduced, showing how it builds on the strengths of co-production while also specifically targeting two major weaknesses that are of heightened importance in an age of multiple crises, namely neglect of political economy and the concept of power
Keywords Science & technology policy  Crisis  Cultural political economy  Governmentality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,348
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.
The Republic of Science.Michael Polanyi - 1962 - Minerva 1 (1):54-73.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization.Kelly Joslin Holloway - 2015 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 40 (5):744-765.
The Bioeconomy as Political Project: A Polanyian Analysis.Vincenzo Pavone & Joanna Goven - 2015 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 40 (3):302-337.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Science for What Democracy?Janine Guespin-Michel - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):95-102.
The Ethics and Economics of Health Care.Nicholas Capaldi - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):571 – 578.
The Economics Profession, the Financial Crisis, and Method.David Colander - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (4):419-427.
The Japanese Political Economy: A Crisis in Theory.Chalmers Johnson - 1988 - Ethics and International Affairs 2:79–97.
On a Universal Scale: Economy in Bataille’s General Economy.Asger Sørensen - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (2):169-197.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #349,114 of 2,420,315 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,337 of 2,420,315 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes