Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):267-269 (2007)

Abstract
: Samia Hurst and Marion Danis provide a thoughtful framework for how to judge the morality of bedside rationing decisions. In this commentary, I applaud Hurst and Danis for advancing the level of debate about bedside rationing. But when I attempt to apply the framework to my own clinical practice, I conclude that the framework comes up short
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2007.0017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Who Should Manage Care? The Case for Patients.Robert M. Veatch - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):391-401.
The Problems with Rule-Based Rationing.Mark A. Hall - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):315-332.
The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
A Framework for Rationing by Clinical Judgment.Samia A. Hurst & Marion Danis - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):247-266.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
17 ( #554,860 of 2,324,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #675,697 of 2,324,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes