In this paper, I will show that Sherlock Holmes was a good logician, according to the standard of the 19th century, both in his character and knowledge (sections 2 and 3). Holmes, in all probability, knew William Stanley Jevons’ clarification of deductive reasoning in terms of “logical alphabets” (section 4). And in view of his use of “analytic-synthetic” distinction and “analytic reasoning,” I will argue that Holmes knew rather well philosophy too, as far as logic and methodology are concerned (section 5). Further, I have argued that Holmes introduced new twists (presumably, following Jevons) into analytic reasoning: application to reasoning as regards causal sequences, and probabilistic elimination of hypotheses (sections 6 and 7). Also, in this context, I will clarify the significance of Holmes’ metaphor of the “little attic”: without fine assortment in your brain, it is hard to devise promising hypotheses (section 8). Finally, presenting a simple model of probabilistic inference, which became prevalent in the 19th century (section 9), I claim that the essence of Holmes’ reasoning consists of probabilistic inferences, “balance probabilities and choose the most likely,” which is nothing but probabilistic elimination of hypotheses in the light of evidence. I also argue that my claim fits in well with the text of Holmes stories (section 10).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Holmes Papers: The Philosophy of Ernest Holmes.Ernest Holmes - 1989 - South Bay Church of Religious Science.
Reasoning to Hypotheses: Where Do Questions Come?Matti Sintonen - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (3):249-266.
G The Automation of Sound Reasoning and Successful Proof Findin.Larry Wos & Branden Fitelson - unknown
Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation.Wendy S. Parker - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Sherlock Holmes ‐ Philosopher Detective.Wulf Rehder - 1979 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):441-457.
Why Sherlock Holmes Can't Be Replaced by an Expert System.Rita C. Manning - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 51 (January):19-28.
"You Know My Method": A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes.Thomas A. Sebeok - 1980 - Gaslight Publications.
Added to index2010-04-18
Total downloads72 ( #72,830 of 2,168,638 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,816 of 2,168,638 )
How can I increase my downloads?