On the production, history, and aspects of the reception of the vienna circle's manifesto

Perspectives on Science 16 (1):70-102 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Considerable unclarity exists in the literature concerning the origin and authorship of Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis, the Vienna Circle's manifesto of 1929 and on the extent of and the reasons for the mixed reception it received in the Circle itself. This paper reconsiders these matters on the light of so far insufficiently consulted documents.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#202,967)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Uebel
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

The American Reception of Logical Positivism: First Encounters, 1929–1932.Sander Verhaegh - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (10):106-142.
The Vienna Circle’s “Scientific World-Conception”: Philosophy of Science in the Political Arena.Donata Romizi - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):205-242.
Neurath on Verstehen.Thomas Uebel - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):912-938.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Testability and meaning.Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.
Testability and meaning (part 1).Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):420-71.
Testability and meaning (part 2).Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - Philosophy of Science 4 (4):1-40.
Die wende der philosophie.Moritz Schlick - 1930 - Erkenntnis 1 (1):4-11.

View all 12 references / Add more references