Reply to Gao’s ”Comment on ”How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements”
Abstract
Shan Gao recently presented a critical reconsideration of a paper I wote on the subject of protective measurement. Here, I take the occasion to reply to his objections.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Comment on "How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements" by Jos Uffink.Shan Gao - 2011
Protective measurements and the meaning of the wave function in the de Broglie-Bohm theory.Shan Gao - unknown
The meaning of protective measurements.Yakir Aharonov, Jeeva Anandan & Lev Vaidman - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (1):117-126.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-09-07
Downloads
28 (#419,126)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2015-09-07
Downloads
28 (#419,126)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements.Shan Gao - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):513-518.
Reply to Gao's “On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements”.Jos Uffink - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):519-523.
