Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (4):241 – 261 (2007)

Abstract
The contemporary debate about "who is a journalist" is occurring in two distinct domains: law and professional ethics. Although the debate in these domains is focused on separate problems, participants treat the central question as essentially the same. This article suggests that the debates in law and professional ethics have to be resolved independently and that debate within those domains needs to be more nuanced. In law, it must vary depending on whether the context involves constitutional law, statutory law, or the distribution of informal privileges by government officials. In professional ethics, the debate should not be oriented around a single definitional threshold but should identify tiers that take account of different communicators' unique goals, tactics, and values.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08900520701583511
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,797
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - Duckworth.
Taking Rights Seriously.Thomas D. Perry - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):80-86.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Alan R. White - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):379-380.
The Virtuous Journalist.Stephen Klaidman - 1987 - Oxford University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
28 ( #377,673 of 2,425,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #546,862 of 2,425,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes