Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):503-504 (2014)
Abstract |
Recent experimental evidence indicates that intuitions about inherence and system justification are distinct psychological processes, and that the inherence heuristic supplies important explanatory frameworks that are accepted or rejected based on their consistency with one's motivation to justify the system.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1017/s0140525x13003890 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is the Inherence Heuristic Needed to Understand System-Justifying Tendencies Among Children?Anna-Kaisa Newheiser & Kristina R. Olson - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):496-497.
Why Does the "Mental Shotgun" Fire System-Justifying Bullets?Danielle Gaucher & John T. Jost - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):489-489.
The Motivated Use and Neglect of Base Rates.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Victoria L. Brescoll & David Pizarro - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):284-285.
A Reintroduction of the Mirroring View in Allen Buchanan's The Heart of Human Rights.[author unknown] - unknown
Do We Need the Inherence Heuristic to Explain the Bias Towards Inherent Explanantions?Yarrow Dunham - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):488-489.
Can the Inherence Heuristic Explain Vitalistic Reasoning?Brock Bastain - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):482-483.
Reasoning About Collectively Accepted Group Beliefs.Raul Hakli & Sara Negri - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (4):531-555.
Refining and Expanding the Proposal of an Inherence Heuristic in Human Understanding.Andrei Cimpian & Erika Salomon - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):506-527.
Refutation Systems for a System of Nonsense-Logic.Robert Sochacki - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):233-239.
What's so Insidious About “Peace, Love, and Understanding”? A System Justification Perspective.John T. Jost, Chadly Stern & David A. Kalkstein - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):438-439.
The Objects of Acceptance: Competing Scientific Explanations.Ronald C. Hopson - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:349 - 363.
Complements, Not Competitors: Causal and Mathematical Explanations.Holly Andersen - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw023.
Efficacious and Sufficient Grace: God’s One Offer of Self-Communication as Accepted or Rejected.Heidi Russell - 2010 - Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):353-372.
Does the Inherence Herutistic Take s to Psychological Essentialism?Anna Marmodoro, Robin A. Murphy & A. G. Baker - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):494-495.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-11-09
Total views
20 ( #514,034 of 2,410,719 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,271 of 2,410,719 )
2017-11-09
Total views
20 ( #514,034 of 2,410,719 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,271 of 2,410,719 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads