Photographic Art: An Ontology Fit to Print

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):31-42 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A standard art-ontological position is to construe repeatable artworks as abstract objects that admit multiple concrete instances. Since photographic artworks are putatively repeatable, the ontology of photographic art is by default modelled after standard repeatable-work ontology. I argue, however, that the construal of photographic artworks as abstracta mistakenly ignores photography’s printmaking genealogy, specifically its ontological inheritance. More precisely, I claim that the products of printmaking media (prints) minimally must be construed in a manner consistent with basic print ontology, the most plausible model of which looks decidedly nominalist (what I call the relevant similarity model) and that as such, photographic artworks must be likewise construed, not as abstracta but as individual and distinct concreta. That is, the correct ontological account of photographic art must be one according to which photographic artworks are individual and distinct concrete artworks. In the end, I show that the ontology of photographic art resists the standard repeatable-work model because the putative repeatability of photographic artworks is upon closer inspection nothing more than the relevant similarity relation between individual and distinct photographic prints.

Similar books and articles

Art & Abstract Objects.Christy Mag Uidhir (ed.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Santayana and the ontology of the photographic image.Irving Singer - 1977 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1):39-43.
André Bazin's ontology of photographic and film imagery.Jonathan Friday - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (4):339–350.
Objectivity in photography.Scott Walden - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):258-272.
Why Pornography Can't Be Art.Christy Mag Uidhir - 2009 - Philosophy and Literature 33 (1):193-203.
Photography and causation: Responding to Scruton's scepticism.Dawn M. Phillips - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (4):327-340.
Failed-Art and Failed Art-Theory.Christy Mag Uidhir - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):381-400.


Added to PP

584 (#16,618)

6 months
69 (#16,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christy Mag Uidhir
University of Houston

Citations of this work

Unfit to Print: Contra Mag Uidhir on the Ontology of Photographic Artworks.Alexey Aliyev - 2016 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):3-13.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Photography.Nigel Warburton - 2003 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.

Add more references