Evaluating Future Nanotechnology: The Net Societal Impacts of Atomically Precise Manufacturing
Futures 100:63-73 (2018)
Abstract
Atomically precise manufacturing (APM) is the assembly of materials with atomic precision. APM does not currently exist, and may not be feasible, but if it is feasible, then the societal impacts could be dramatic. This paper assesses the net societal impacts of APM across the full range of important APM sectors: general material wealth, environmental issues, military affairs, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and space travel. Positive effects were found for material wealth, the environment, military affairs (specifically nuclear disarmament), and space travel. Negative effects were found for military affairs (specifically rogue actor violence and AI. The net effect for surveillance was ambiguous. The effects for the environment, military affairs, and AI appear to be the largest, with the environment perhaps being the largest of these, suggesting that APM would be net beneficial to society. However, these factors are not well quantified and no definitive conclusion can be made. One conclusion that can be reached is that if APM R&D is pursued, it should go hand-in-hand with effective governance strategies to increase the benefits and reduce the harms.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethics in Nanotechnology: What’s Being Done? What’s Missing? [REVIEW]Louis Y. Y. Lu, Bruce J. Y. Lin, John S. Liu & Chang-Yung Yu - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):583-598.
The social impacts of nanotechnology: An ethical and political analysis. [REVIEW]Robert Sparrow - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):13-23.
Exploring Societal and Ethical Views of Nanotechnology REUs.Gina M. Eosco, Meghnaa Tallapragada, Katherine A. McComas & Merrill Brady - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (1):91-99.
Nanotechnology, Sensors, and Rights to Privacy.Alan Rubel - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (2):131-153.
The general idea and usage of manufacturing knowledge data-contained differences of production culture.Tohru Ihara & Jie Zhu - 2003 - AI and Society 17 (3-4):256-265.
Proposed strategies for teaching ethics of nanotechnology.Heidi Jiao - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):221-228.
Introduction to the Field of Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy.Jonathan D. Linton & Steven T. Walsh - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):547-549.
Research on the Societal Impacts of Nanotechnology: A Preliminary Comparison of USA, Europe & Japan.Masami Matsuda & Geoffrey Hunt - unknown
Green dreams of reason. Green nanotechnology between visions of excess and control.Astrid E. Schwarz - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):109-118.
Nanoethics in a Nanolab: Ethics via Participation. [REVIEW]Julio R. Tuma - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):983-1005.
Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance.L. J. Frewer, A. R. H. Fischer & N. Gupta - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):93-108.
Agile manufacturing strategy and business ethics.J. Poesche - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (4):307 - 326.
Why do we need to know what the public thinks about nanotechnology?Craig Cormick - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):167-173.
The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):461-486.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-04-22
Downloads
583 (#16,733)
6 months
45 (#30,436)
2018-04-22
Downloads
583 (#16,733)
6 months
45 (#30,436)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design.Steven Umbrello - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):575-595.
References found in this work
If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):31-46.
On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence.Seth D. Baum - 2017 - AI and Society 32 (4):543-551.