Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property

Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We prove various theorems about the preservation and destruction of the tree property at ω2. Working in a model of Mitchell [9] where the tree property holds at ω2, we prove that ω2 still has the tree property after ccc forcing of size \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\aleph_1}$$\end{document} or adding an arbitrary number of Cohen reals. We show that there is a relatively mild forcing in this same model which destroys the tree property. Finally we prove from a supercompact cardinal that the tree property at ω2 can be indestructible under ω2-directed closed forcing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the consistency of the definable tree property on ℵ.Amir Leshem - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1204 - 1214.
The tree property at א ω+2.Sy-David Friedman & Ajdin Halilović - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):477 - 490.
An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322.
The tree property at ℵ ω+1.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):279-290.
On iterating semiproper preorders.Tadatoshi Miyamoto - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (4):1431-1468.
Reals n-Generic Relative to Some Perfect Tree.Bernard A. Anderson - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):401 - 411.
The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):553-562.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
50 (#311,977)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The tree property up to אω+1.Itay Neeman - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (2):429-459.
Fragility and indestructibility II.Spencer Unger - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1110-1122.
Specializing trees and answer to a question of Williams.Mohammad Golshani & Saharon Shelah - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (1):2050023.
The tree property below ℵ ω ⋅ 2.Spencer Unger - 2016 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 167 (3):247-261.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
Set theory.Thomas Jech - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic.
Constructibility.Keith J. Devlin - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):864-867.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.

View all 9 references / Add more references